Atom C3708 vs E-300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E-300 and Atom C3708 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Atom
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date22 August 2011 (13 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$209

Detailed specifications

E-300 and Atom C3708 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.7 GHz
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache64K (per core)448 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E-300 and Atom C3708 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT1FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-300 and Atom C3708. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVMno data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

E-300 and Atom C3708 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-300 and Atom C3708 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-300 and Atom C3708. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-300 and Atom C3708.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 August 2011 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 17 Watt

Atom C3708 has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E-300 and Atom C3708. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-300 is a notebook processor while Atom C3708 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-300 and Atom C3708, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-300
E-300
Intel Atom C3708
Atom C3708

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 303 votes

Rate E-300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom C3708 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-300 or Atom C3708, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.