i9-12900E vs E-240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E-240 and Core i9-12900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data24.44
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-240 and Core i9-12900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm10 nm
Die size75 mm2215 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E-240 and Core i9-12900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-Ball1700
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-240 and Core i9-12900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

E-240 and Core i9-12900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-240 and Core i9-12900E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-240 and Core i9-12900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6310Intel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-240 and Core i9-12900E.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-240 195
i9-12900E 26666
+13575%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-240 107
i9-12900E 1752
+1537%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-240 111
i9-12900E 10392
+9262%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 4 January 2022
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

E-240 has 261.1% lower power consumption.

i9-12900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E-240 and Core i9-12900E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-240 is a notebook processor while Core i9-12900E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-240 and Core i9-12900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-240
E-240
Intel Core i9-12900E
Core i9-12900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 55 votes

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 21 vote

Rate Core i9-12900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-240 or Core i9-12900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.