Athlon 1000 vs E-240

VS

Primary details

Comparing E-240 and Athlon 1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3354not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency0.63no data
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Thunderbird C (2000−2001)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)6 March 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,299

Detailed specifications

E-240 and Athlon 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm180 nm
Die size75 mm2102 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E-240 and Athlon 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallA
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-240 and Athlon 1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-240 and Athlon 1000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-240 and Athlon 1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 6 March 2000
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

E-240 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 261.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E-240 and Athlon 1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-240 is a notebook processor while Athlon 1000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-240 and Athlon 1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-240
E-240
AMD Athlon 1000
Athlon 1000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 55 votes

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 36 votes

Rate Athlon 1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-240 or Athlon 1000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.