Celeron 3865U vs Core i7-3770
Aggregate performance score
i7-3770 outperforms Celeron 3865U by a whopping 388% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-3770 and Celeron 3865U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1331 | 2477 |
| Place by popularity | 14 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.97 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 8 April 2012 (12 years ago) | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $294 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3770 and Celeron 3865U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 160 mm2 | 98.7 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3770 and Celeron 3865U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1155 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770 and Celeron 3865U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-3770 and Celeron 3865U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770 and Celeron 3865U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770 and Celeron 3865U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3, DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4000 | Intel HD Graphics 610 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770 and Celeron 3865U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 388% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 386% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 71% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 233% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.15 | 0.85 |
| Recency | 8 April 2012 | 3 January 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt | 15 Watt |
i7-3770 has a 388.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron 3865U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 413.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-3770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3865U in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-3770 is a desktop processor while Celeron 3865U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770 and Celeron 3865U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
