Athlon MP 1900+ vs Duron 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD DuronAMD Athlon MP
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2004)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date15 August 2003 (21 year ago)12 December 2001 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$319

Detailed specifications

Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeFSBFSB
Bus rate266.66 MT/s266 MT/s
Multiplier1212
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache64 KB256 KB
Chip lithography130 nm180 nm
Die size80.89 mm2128 mm2
Number of transistors37 Million38 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt66 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size4 GB4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2003 12 December 2001
Chip lithography 130 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 66 Watt

Duron 1600 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 15.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Duron 1600 is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 1900+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Duron 1600
Duron 1600
AMD Athlon MP 1900+
Athlon MP 1900+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 7 votes

Rate Duron 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Duron 1600 or Athlon MP 1900+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.