Celeron 6205 vs Duron 1400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Duron 1400 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD DuronIntel Tiger Lake
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2004)Tiger Lake U (2020)
Release date15 August 2003 (21 year ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Duron 1400 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2/2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate266.66 MT/sno data
Multiplier10.5no data
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache64 KB2.5 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography130 nm10 nm
Die size80.89 mm2no data
Number of transistors37 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Duron 1400 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataBGA1499
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt15 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 1400 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2003 1 September 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 6205 has an age advantage of 17 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Duron 1400 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Duron 1400 is a desktop processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Duron 1400 and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Duron 1400
Duron 1400
Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Duron 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Duron 1400 or Celeron 6205, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.