Microsoft SQ1 vs D-1513N
Primary details
Comparing D-1513N and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1482 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon D | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.12 |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $192 | no data |
Detailed specifications
D-1513N and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 246.24 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on D-1513N and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by D-1513N and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
D-1513N and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by D-1513N and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by D-1513N and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 3000 Watt |
D-1513N has 8471.4% lower power consumption.
Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between D-1513N and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that D-1513N is a server/workstation processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between D-1513N and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
