Celeron M 350 vs m7-6Y75
Primary details
Comparing Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2153 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core m7 | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 30.80 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake-Y (2015) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $393 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 400 MHz |
| Multiplier | 12 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 98.57 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1750 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.26V |
Compatibility
Information on Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479, H-PBGA478, PPGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| My WiFi | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Smart Response | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 515 | no data |
| Max video memory | 16 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 10 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 21 Watt |
m7-6Y75 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 425% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron M 350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
