Celeron J1850 vs m5-6Y57

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m5-6Y57
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.48
+151%
Celeron J1850
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.59

Core m5-6Y57 outperforms Celeron J1850 by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21562797
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency28.015.58
Architecture codenameSkylake-Y (2015)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$82

Detailed specifications

Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 515Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz792 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes104

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m5-6Y57 1.48
+151%
Celeron J1850 0.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m5-6Y57 2345
+149%
Celeron J1850 942

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 0.59
Integrated graphics card 1.64 0.77
Recency 1 September 2015 1 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 10 Watt

m5-6Y57 has a 150.8% higher aggregate performance score, 113% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Celeron J1850, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Core m5-6Y57 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron J1850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m5-6Y57
Core m5-6Y57
Intel Celeron J1850
Celeron J1850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 53 votes

Rate Core m5-6Y57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 11 votes

Rate Celeron J1850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m5-6Y57 or Celeron J1850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.