Ryzen 7 5800H vs m5-6Y54

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m5-6Y54
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.46
Ryzen 7 5800H
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
13.48
+823%

Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms Core m5-6Y54 by a whopping 823% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2185561
Place by popularitynot in top-10081
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m5AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency27.1227.82
Architecture codenameSkylake-Y (2015)Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier1132
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size98.57 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1515FP6
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data

Security technologies

Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 515AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes10no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m5-6Y54 1.46
Ryzen 7 5800H 13.48
+823%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m5-6Y54 2269
Ryzen 7 5800H 21011
+826%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

m5-6Y54 3962
Ryzen 7 5800H 6017
+51.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

m5-6Y54 6899
Ryzen 7 5800H 36735
+432%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

m5-6Y54 2935
Ryzen 7 5800H 12790
+336%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

m5-6Y54 26.08
Ryzen 7 5800H 6.12
+326%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

m5-6Y54 2
Ryzen 7 5800H 22
+840%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

m5-6Y54 223
Ryzen 7 5800H 2005
+801%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

m5-6Y54 103
Ryzen 7 5800H 229
+122%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

m5-6Y54 1.1
Ryzen 7 5800H 2.72
+147%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

m5-6Y54 1.5
Ryzen 7 5800H 10
+567%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

m5-6Y54 11
Ryzen 7 5800H 105
+841%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

m5-6Y54 63
Ryzen 7 5800H 244
+290%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

m5-6Y54 2111
Ryzen 7 5800H 6851
+225%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 13.48
Integrated graphics card 1.64 9.03
Recency 1 September 2015 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 45 Watt

m5-6Y54 has 1025% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 5800H, on the other hand, has a 823.3% higher aggregate performance score, 450.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 5800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m5-6Y54 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 7 5800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m5-6Y54
Core m5-6Y54
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Ryzen 7 5800H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 33 votes

Rate Core m5-6Y54 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4175 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m5-6Y54 or Ryzen 7 5800H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.