Xeon W-3265M vs m3-8100Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-8100Y
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
1.80
Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
21.28
+1082%

Xeon W-3265M outperforms Core m3-8100Y by a whopping 1082% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2006252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.89
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore m3Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency34.079.82
Architecture codenameAmber Lake-Y (2018−2021)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date30 August 2018 (6 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$6,353

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate4 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache128 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache512 KB24 MB
L3 cache4 MB33 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1515FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size16 GB2 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth33.3 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 615no data
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-8100Y 1.80
Xeon W-3265M 21.28
+1082%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-8100Y 2864
Xeon W-3265M 33800
+1080%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 21.28
Recency 30 August 2018 3 June 2019
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 48
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 205 Watt

m3-8100Y has 4000% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3265M, on the other hand, has a 1082.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Xeon W-3265M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-8100Y in performance tests.

Be aware that Core m3-8100Y is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3265M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-3265M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-8100Y
Core m3-8100Y
Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 114 votes

Rate Core m3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-8100Y or Xeon W-3265M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.