Xeon W-1390 vs m3-8100Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-8100Y
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
1.84
Xeon W-1390
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
15.33
+733%

Xeon W-1390 outperforms Core m3-8100Y by a whopping 733% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2005467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data65.64
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore m3no data
Power efficiency34.1817.80
Architecture codenameAmber Lake-Y (2018−2021)Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Release date30 August 2018 (6 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$494

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data276 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth33.3 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 615Intel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memory16 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-8100Y 1.84
Xeon W-1390 15.33
+733%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-8100Y 2863
Xeon W-1390 23902
+735%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.84 15.33
Integrated graphics card 1.98 4.56
Recency 30 August 2018 6 May 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 80 Watt

m3-8100Y has 1500% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-1390, on the other hand, has a 733.2% higher aggregate performance score, 130.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon W-1390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-8100Y in performance tests.

Be aware that Core m3-8100Y is a notebook processor while Xeon W-1390 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-8100Y and Xeon W-1390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-8100Y
Core m3-8100Y
Intel Xeon W-1390
Xeon W-1390

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 114 votes

Rate Core m3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-1390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-8100Y or Xeon W-1390, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.