Atom x5-Z8550 vs m3-8100Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-8100Y
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
1.80
+150%

Core m3-8100Y outperforms Atom x5-Z8550 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20052685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore m35x Intel Atom
Power efficiency34.07no data
Architecture codenameAmber Lake-Y (2018−2021)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date30 August 2018 (6 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1515UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)5 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth33.3 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 615Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
Max video memory16 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz3840x2160
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz2560x1600
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes102
USB revisionno data3.0
Number of USB portsno data3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-8100Y 1.80
+150%
Atom x5-Z8550 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-8100Y 2864
+150%
Atom x5-Z8550 1144

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

m3-8100Y 180
+34%
Atom x5-Z8550 134

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

m3-8100Y 97
+168%
Atom x5-Z8550 36

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 0.72
Recency 30 August 2018 8 February 2016
Physical cores 2 4

m3-8100Y has a 150% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Atom x5-Z8550, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Core m3-8100Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-8100Y and Atom x5-Z8550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-8100Y
Core m3-8100Y
Intel Atom x5-Z8550
Atom x5-Z8550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 114 votes

Rate Core m3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 22 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-8100Y or Atom x5-Z8550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.