Celeron N4100 vs m3-7Y32

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-7Y32
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.79
+11.2%

Core m3-7Y32 outperforms Celeron N4100 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20282111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency36.2724.47
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date21 April 2017 (7 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$107

Detailed specifications

Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier1111
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 deg C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+-
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 615Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory16 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes106
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-7Y32 1.79
+11.2%
Celeron N4100 1.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-7Y32 2733
+11.2%
Celeron N4100 2457

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

m3-7Y32 265
+33.8%
Celeron N4100 198

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

m3-7Y32 120
+74.9%
Celeron N4100 69

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

m3-7Y32 1576
+24%
Celeron N4100 1271

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.79 1.61
Integrated graphics card 1.87 0.87
Recency 21 April 2017 11 December 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 6 Watt

m3-7Y32 has a 11.2% higher aggregate performance score, 114.9% faster integrated GPU, and 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron N4100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 100% more physical cores.

The Core m3-7Y32 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-7Y32
Core m3-7Y32
Intel Celeron N4100
Celeron N4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 22 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 430 votes

Rate Celeron N4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-7Y32 or Celeron N4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.