Athlon 3000G vs m3-6Y30
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 3000G outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2226 | 1667 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.27 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core m3 | AMD Athlon |
Power efficiency | 28.77 | 7.63 |
Architecture codename | Skylake-Y (2015) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
Release date | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) | 7 November 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | $49 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bus rate | 4 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 9 | 35 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 209.78 mm2? |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 4940 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FCBGA1515 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Smart Response | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 64 GB? |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 515 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Max video memory | 16 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 850 MHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 10 | 6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.42 | 2.93 |
Integrated graphics card | 1.64 | 2.98 |
Recency | 1 September 2015 | 7 November 2019 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 35 Watt |
m3-6Y30 has 775% lower power consumption.
Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has a 106.3% higher aggregate performance score, 81.7% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 4 years.
The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-6Y30 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core m3-6Y30 is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.