Xeon E-2488 vs i9-9940X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9940X
2018
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
17.61
Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.29
+3.9%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Core i9-9940X by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking350324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.0874.79
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency10.1018.22
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,387$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2488 has 1372% better value for money than i9-9940X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2816
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s16 GT/s
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size484 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature88 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++

Security technologies

Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9940X 17.61
Xeon E-2488 18.29
+3.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9940X 27975
Xeon E-2488 29060
+3.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.61 18.29
Recency 19 October 2018 14 December 2023
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 28 16
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 95 Watt

i9-9940X has 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

Xeon E-2488, on the other hand, has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 73.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488.

Note that Core i9-9940X is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9940X and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9940X
Core i9-9940X
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 38 votes

Rate Core i9-9940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9940X or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.