EPYC 4364P vs i9-9920X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 165 Watt
16.44
EPYC 4364P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
23.60
+43.6%

EPYC 4364P outperforms Core i9-9920X by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9920X and EPYC 4364P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking421228
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.1144.11
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency9.0920.50
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,189$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4364P has 763% better value for money than i9-9920X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9920X and EPYC 4364P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.5 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size484 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature92 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9920X and EPYC 4364P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066AM5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9920X and EPYC 4364P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-9920X and EPYC 4364P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9920X and EPYC 4364P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9920X and EPYC 4364P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9920X and EPYC 4364P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4428

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9920X 16.44
EPYC 4364P 23.60
+43.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9920X 25163
EPYC 4364P 36124
+43.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.44 23.60
Recency 8 October 2018 21 May 2024
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 105 Watt

i9-9920X has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

EPYC 4364P, on the other hand, has a 43.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4364P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9920X in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9920X is a desktop processor while EPYC 4364P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9920X and EPYC 4364P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9920X
Core i9-9920X
AMD EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 15 votes

Rate Core i9-9920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4364P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9920X or EPYC 4364P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.