Xeon W-3223 vs i9-9900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900X
2018
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
13.76
+28.6%
Xeon W-3223
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
10.70

Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon W-3223 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900X and Xeon W-3223 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking534726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.9018.63
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency7.896.33
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$989$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3223 has 280% better value for money than i9-9900X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900X and Xeon W-3223 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3535
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature92 °C68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900X and Xeon W-3223 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900X and Xeon W-3223. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i9-9900X and Xeon W-3223 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900X and Xeon W-3223 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900X and Xeon W-3223. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900X and Xeon W-3223.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900X 13.76
+28.6%
Xeon W-3223 10.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900X 21851
+28.5%
Xeon W-3223 17003

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-9900X 1454
+6.1%
Xeon W-3223 1371

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-9900X 9320
+14.7%
Xeon W-3223 8125

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.76 10.70
Recency 19 October 2018 3 June 2019
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 160 Watt

i9-9900X has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

Xeon W-3223, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 3.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-9900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3223 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900X is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3223 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900X and Xeon W-3223, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900X
Core i9-9900X
Intel Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 101 vote

Rate Core i9-9900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3223 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900X or Xeon W-3223, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.