Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs i9-9900KS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900KS
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 127 Watt
12.25
Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.45
+34.3%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i9-9900KS by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking634404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.822.32
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency9.1310.74
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date28 October 2019 (5 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$513$4,938

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900KS has 366% better value for money than Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads1644
Base clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0QPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier4024
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)55 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size180 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C70 °C
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)127 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630N/A
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900KS 12.25
Xeon E5-2699A v4 16.45
+34.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900KS 19461
Xeon E5-2699A v4 26129
+34.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-9900KS 1811
+53.9%
Xeon E5-2699A v4 1177

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-9900KS 8647
Xeon E5-2699A v4 9546
+10.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.25 16.45
Recency 28 October 2019 25 October 2016
Physical cores 8 22
Threads 16 44
Power consumption (TDP) 127 Watt 145 Watt

i9-9900KS has an age advantage of 3 years, and 14.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2699A v4, on the other hand, has a 34.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 175% more physical cores and 175% more threads.

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9900KS in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900KS is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900KS and Xeon E5-2699A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900KS
Core i9-9900KS
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 186 votes

Rate Core i9-9900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 53 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900KS or Xeon E5-2699A v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.