Xeon E3-1240 v6 vs i9-9900K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900K
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
11.93
+111%

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v6 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6701146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.107.12
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)Intel Xeon E3
Power efficiency11.457.17
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)28 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$272

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900K has 14% better value for money than Xeon E3-1240 v6.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache512 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA-1151FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt72 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+-

Security technologies

Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth44.668 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24HzN/A
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60HzN/A
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60HzN/A
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900K 11.93
+111%
Xeon E3-1240 v6 5.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900K 18263
+111%
Xeon E3-1240 v6 8656

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-9900K 1701
+21.8%
Xeon E3-1240 v6 1396

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-9900K 8041
+83.3%
Xeon E3-1240 v6 4387

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.93 5.66
Recency 8 October 2018 28 March 2017
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 72 Watt

i9-9900K has a 110.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon E3-1240 v6, on the other hand, has 31.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-9900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 v6 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9900K is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1240 v6 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1240 v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900K
Core i9-9900K
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v6
Xeon E3-1240 v6

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2340 votes

Rate Core i9-9900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 18 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900K or Xeon E3-1240 v6, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.