Core i5-13400E vs Core i9-9900K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking633not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.66no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Raptor Lake-S
Release date8 October 2018 (5 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache512 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14++ nm10 nm
Die size178 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketLGA-11511700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
SIPP+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth44.668 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 730

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-9900K 1674
+26.3%
i5-13400E 1325

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-9900K 7975
i5-13400E 8823
+10.6%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2018 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

i5-13400E has an age advantage of 4 years, 25% more physical cores, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900K and Core i5-13400E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900K
Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i5-13400E
Core i5-13400E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2250 votes

Rate Core i9-9900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Core i5-13400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900K or Core i5-13400E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.