Xeon X5670 vs i9-7960X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7960X
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 165 Watt
18.90
+374%

Core i9-7960X outperforms Xeon X5670 by a whopping 374% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7960X and Xeon X5670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3241447
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.171.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Xeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency10.443.83
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-7960X has 199% better value for money than Xeon X5670.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7960X and Xeon X5670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s6400 MHz
L1 cache1 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache22 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size484 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature98 °C81 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7960X and Xeon X5670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7960X and Xeon X5670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7960X and Xeon X5670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7960X and Xeon X5670 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7960X and Xeon X5670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB288 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7960X and Xeon X5670.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7960X 18.90
+374%
Xeon X5670 3.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7960X 28923
+374%
Xeon X5670 6104

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-7960X 1308
+166%
Xeon X5670 492

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-7960X 10332
+356%
Xeon X5670 2268

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.90 3.99
Recency 30 May 2017 16 March 2010
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 95 Watt

i9-7960X has a 373.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X5670, on the other hand, has 73.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-7960X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7960X is a desktop processor while Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7960X and Xeon X5670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7960X
Core i9-7960X
Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 45 votes

Rate Core i9-7960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 473 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7960X or Xeon X5670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.