Xeon Gold 5318Y vs i9-7940X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7940X
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
16.95
Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
21.75
+28.3%

Xeon Gold 5318Y outperforms Core i9-7940X by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7940X and Xeon Gold 5318Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking398256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.16no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency9.3712.02
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7940X and Xeon Gold 5318Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2848
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache896 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache14 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature102 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data87 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7940X and Xeon Gold 5318Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon Gold 5318Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i9-7940X and Xeon Gold 5318Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon Gold 5318Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon Gold 5318Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon Gold 5318Y.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7940X 16.95
Xeon Gold 5318Y 21.75
+28.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7940X 25944
Xeon Gold 5318Y 33283
+28.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.95 21.75
Recency 30 May 2017 6 April 2021
Physical cores 14 24
Threads 28 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Xeon Gold 5318Y has a 28.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5318Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-7940X in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7940X is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5318Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7940X and Xeon Gold 5318Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7940X
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 42 votes

Rate Core i9-7940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7940X or Xeon Gold 5318Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.