Xeon E5-2666 V3 vs i9-7940X

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7940X
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
16.65
+82.2%
Xeon E5-2666 V3
2014
10 cores / 20 threads, 135 Watt
9.14

Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon E5-2666 V3 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7940X and Xeon E5-2666 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking402854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.94no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency9.376.29
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)13 November 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7940X and Xeon E5-2666 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2820
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache896 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache14 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size484 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature102 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7940X and Xeon E5-2666 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA20662011-3
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon E5-2666 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7940X and Xeon E5-2666 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon E5-2666 V3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon E5-2666 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7940X and Xeon E5-2666 V3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4440

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7940X 16.65
+82.2%
Xeon E5-2666 V3 9.14

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7940X 25954
+82.3%
Xeon E5-2666 V3 14240

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.65 9.14
Recency 30 May 2017 13 November 2014
Physical cores 14 10
Threads 28 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 135 Watt

i9-7940X has a 82.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 40% more physical cores and 40% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2666 V3, on the other hand, has 22.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-7940X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2666 V3 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7940X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2666 V3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7940X and Xeon E5-2666 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7940X
Intel Xeon E5-2666 V3
Xeon E5-2666 V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 42 votes

Rate Core i9-7940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3102 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2666 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7940X or Xeon E5-2666 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.