Ryzen Threadripper 1956 vs i9-7920X

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking472not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency10.06no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date10 September 2017 (7 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads24no data
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)32768 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes44no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1956 has 12% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1956, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7920X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1956
Ryzen Threadripper 1956

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate Core i9-7920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1956 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7920X or Ryzen Threadripper 1956, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.