Xeon W3680 vs i9-7900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7900X
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
13.76
+201%

Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon W3680 by a whopping 201% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7900X and Xeon W3680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5581330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.902.18
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency8.963.21
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Gulftown (2010−2011)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999$350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-7900X has 33% better value for money than Xeon W3680.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7900X and Xeon W3680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache640 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache10 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache13.75 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data239 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7900X and Xeon W3680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket R4FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon W3680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7900X and Xeon W3680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon W3680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon W3680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB24 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon W3680.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7900X 13.76
+201%
Xeon W3680 4.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7900X 21059
+201%
Xeon W3680 6994

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-7900X 1443
+165%
Xeon W3680 545

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-7900X 8848
+254%
Xeon W3680 2497

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.76 4.57
Recency 30 May 2017 16 March 2010
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 130 Watt

i9-7900X has a 201.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon W3680, on the other hand, has 7.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3680 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7900X is a desktop processor while Xeon W3680 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and Xeon W3680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7900X
Core i9-7900X
Intel Xeon W3680
Xeon W3680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 215 votes

Rate Core i9-7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 142 votes

Rate Xeon W3680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7900X or Xeon W3680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.