Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Core i9-7900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7900X
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
13.64
+11.4%
Xeon E5-2698 v3
2014
16 cores / 32 threads, 135 Watt
12.24

i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2698 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking518599
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.7915.32
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Haswell-EP (2014)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)8 September 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2698 v3 has 220% better value for money than i9-7900X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2698 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache640 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache10 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache13.75 MB40 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C88 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2698 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSocket R42011-3
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2698 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++

Security technologies

Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2698 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2698 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2698 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2698 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4440

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7900X 13.64
+11.4%
Xeon E5-2698 v3 12.24

Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-7900X 21099
+11.5%
Xeon E5-2698 v3 18929

Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 by 11% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i9-7900X 1431
+38%
Xeon E5-2698 v3 1037

Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 by 38% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

i9-7900X 8863
+21.4%
Xeon E5-2698 v3 7300

Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.64 12.24
Recency 30 May 2017 8 September 2014
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 135 Watt

i9-7900X has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2698 v3, on the other hand, has 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads, and 3.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2698 v3 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-7900X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2698 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and Xeon E5-2698 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7900X
Core i9-7900X
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Xeon E5-2698 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 203 votes

Rate Core i9-7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 231 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2698 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7900X or Xeon E5-2698 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.