Xeon E5-2620 vs i9-14900HX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-14900HX
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
28.73
+763%
Xeon E5-2620
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.33

Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon E5-2620 by a whopping 763% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1581586
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.73
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesRaptor Lake-HXno data
Power efficiency49.403.32
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$36

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate157 MHz7.2 GT/s
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm32 nm
Die size257 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1964FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR3
Maximum memory size192 GB384 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s42.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 14th Gen Intel Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-14900HX 28.73
+763%
Xeon E5-2620 3.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-14900HX 45634
+762%
Xeon E5-2620 5293

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-14900HX 2701
+567%
Xeon E5-2620 405

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-14900HX 15883
+709%
Xeon E5-2620 1963

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.73 3.33
Recency 8 January 2024 6 March 2012
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 32 12
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 95 Watt

i9-14900HX has a 762.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and 72.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-14900HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-14900HX is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2620 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-14900HX and Xeon E5-2620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-14900HX
Core i9-14900HX
Intel Xeon E5-2620
Xeon E5-2620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 442 votes

Rate Core i9-14900HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 517 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-14900HX or Xeon E5-2620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.