EPYC 9455 vs i9-14900F

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking142not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.58no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency43.26no data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-R (2023−2024)Turin (2024)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524$5,412

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads3296
Base clock speed2 GHz3.15 GHz
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)192 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm26x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data49,890 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1700SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2024 10 October 2024
Physical cores 24 48
Threads 32 96
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 300 Watt

i9-14900F has 361.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9455, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i9-14900F is a desktop processor while EPYC 9455 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-14900F and EPYC 9455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F
AMD EPYC 9455
EPYC 9455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 91 vote

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-14900F or EPYC 9455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.