Apple M4 Max (16 cores) vs i9-14900F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-14900F
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
29.62
+5.6%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.04

Core i9-14900F outperforms Apple M4 Max (16 cores) by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking143165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation50.98no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency42.9029.33
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-R (2023−2024)no data
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz4.51 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache36 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M4 40-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores).

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.62 28.04
Recency 8 January 2024 30 October 2024
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 90 Watt

i9-14900F has a 5.6% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 38.5% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 Max (16 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores).

Note that Core i9-14900F is a desktop processor while Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-14900F and Apple M4 Max (16 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 91 vote

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-14900F or Apple M4 Max (16 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.