Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs i9-13900K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900K
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.09
+120%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.83

Core i9-13900K outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking88393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation62.98no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency28.0845.51
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores16no data
Threads3216
Base clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache80K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache36 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5no data
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900K 37.09
+120%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900K 58917
+120%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26730

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-13900K 3001
+34.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2228

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-13900K 20183
+89.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10627

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i9-13900K 20192
+36.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-13900K 5806
+138%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-13900K 318
+18.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-13900K 24033
+118%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037

Blender(-)

i9-13900K 84
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 203
+142%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-13900K 2286
+21.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888

7-Zip Single

i9-13900K 7272
+12%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 6496

7-Zip

i9-13900K 146984
+121%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 66442

WebXPRT 3

i9-13900K 368
+1.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 363

CrossMark Overall

i9-13900K 2580
+59.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1620

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i9-13900K 316
+30.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 242

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i9-13900K 141
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 327
+133%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.09 16.83
Integrated graphics card 6.16 18.30
Recency 27 September 2022 13 June 2023
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

i9-13900K has a 120.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, on the other hand, has 197.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 months, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900K is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1965 votes

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900K or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.