Ryzen 5 7500F vs i9-13900K

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900K
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
38.57
+119%

Core i9-13900K outperforms Ryzen 5 7500F by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking88377
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.4066.39
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency13.9024.72
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)22 July 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 7500F has 10% better value for money than i9-13900K.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate4 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die size257 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700AM5
Power consumption (TDP)125 W, 253 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.604 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900K 38.57
+119%
Ryzen 5 7500F 17.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900K 59031
+119%
Ryzen 5 7500F 26960

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-13900K 3005
+9.6%
Ryzen 5 7500F 2743

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-13900K 20240
+60.5%
Ryzen 5 7500F 12611

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.57 17.62
Recency 27 September 2022 22 July 2023
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 32 12
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900K has a 118.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7500F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7500F in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 7500F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 5 7500F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1902 votes

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2902 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7500F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900K or Ryzen 5 7500F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.