Processor N200 vs i9-13900F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
32.27
+1969%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Core i9-13900F outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 1969% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900F and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1252109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.71no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency46.9824.61
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900F and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900F and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900F and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900F and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900F and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900F and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900F and Processor N200.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes209

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.27 1.56
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 32 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

i9-13900F has a 1968.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900F is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900F and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 157 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 145 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900F or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.