EPYC 4364P vs i9-13900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
29.57
+30%
EPYC 4364P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
22.74

Core i9-13900 outperforms EPYC 4364P by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking144228
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.0643.93
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency22.3920.50
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900 has 5% better value for money than EPYC 4364P.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die size257 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700AM5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770AMD Radeon Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900 29.57
+30%
EPYC 4364P 22.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900 46967
+30%
EPYC 4364P 36124

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.57 22.74
Integrated graphics card 6.15 1.98
Recency 4 January 2023 21 May 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 105 Watt

i9-13900 has a 30% higher aggregate performance score, 210.6% faster integrated GPU, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 4364P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 19% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4364P in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4364P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900 and EPYC 4364P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900
Core i9-13900
AMD EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 119 votes

Rate Core i9-13900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4364P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900 or EPYC 4364P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.