Xeon Gold 5411N vs i9-13700HX
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Raptor Lake-HX | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,388 |
Detailed specifications
Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 45 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 84 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N.
| PCIe version | no data | 5 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 24 |
| Threads | 24 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 165 Watt |
i9-13700HX has 32% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5411N, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i9-13700HX is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5411N is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13700HX and Xeon Gold 5411N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
