i3-N305 vs i9-12950HX

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-12950HX
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 55 Watt
20.35
+225%
Core i3-N305
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.27

Core i9-12950HX outperforms Core i3-N305 by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2701065
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency35.0239.56
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-HX (2022)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date10 May 2022 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Detailed specifications

Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.3 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per module)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size215 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1964FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz1.25 GHz
Execution Units3232

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hz4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112.1
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes209
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-12950HX 20.35
+225%
i3-N305 6.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-12950HX 32323
+225%
i3-N305 9956

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-12950HX 3107
+275%
i3-N305 829

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-12950HX 274
+66.4%
i3-N305 165

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-12950HX 15229
+228%
i3-N305 4644

Blender(-)

i9-12950HX 175
i3-N305 589
+237%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-12950HX 1886
+76.1%
i3-N305 1071

7-Zip Single

i9-12950HX 6197
+51%
i3-N305 4105

7-Zip

i9-12950HX 77003
+263%
i3-N305 21239

WebXPRT 3

i9-12950HX 311
+67.7%
i3-N305 185

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.35 6.27
Recency 10 May 2022 3 January 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 24 8
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

i9-12950HX has a 224.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i3-N305, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-12950HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-N305 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12950HX and Core i3-N305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-12950HX
Core i9-12950HX
Intel Core i3-N305
Core i3-N305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 28 votes

Rate Core i9-12950HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 626 votes

Rate Core i3-N305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-12950HX or Core i3-N305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.