Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs i9-12900HX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-12900HX
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 55 Watt
21.24
+34%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
15.85

Core i9-12900HX outperforms Ryzen Z1 Extreme by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking259429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency36.55100.00
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-HX (2022)Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date10 May 2022 (2 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size215 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1964FP8
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-12900HX 21.24
+34%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 15.85

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-12900HX 33744
+34%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 25182

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-12900HX 3566
+52.7%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 2336

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-12900HX 278
+3.7%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 268

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-12900HX 16312
+59%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 10258

Blender(-)

i9-12900HX 149
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 214
+43.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-12900HX 1907
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 1908
+0.1%

7-Zip Single

i9-12900HX 6336
+2.3%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 6197

7-Zip

i9-12900HX 86541
+38.1%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 62657

WebXPRT 3

i9-12900HX 318
+4.4%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 304

CrossMark Overall

i9-12900HX 2151
+26.1%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 1706

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i9-12900HX 275
+4.8%
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 263

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i9-12900HX 267
Ryzen Z1 Extreme 366
+37.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.24 15.85
Integrated graphics card 5.58 18.32
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

i9-12900HX has a 34% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen Z1 Extreme, on the other hand, has 228.3% faster integrated GPU, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-12900HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Z1 Extreme in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen Z1 Extreme, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-12900HX
Core i9-12900HX
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Ryzen Z1 Extreme

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 136 votes

Rate Core i9-12900HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 454 votes

Rate Ryzen Z1 Extreme on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-12900HX or Ryzen Z1 Extreme, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.