Ryzen 7 7435HS vs i9-12900E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-12900E
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
17.13
+13.9%
Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
15.04

Core i9-12900E outperforms Ryzen 7 7435HS by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7435HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking376471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataRyzen 7000 Series
Power efficiency24.9431.63
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Rembrandt R
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7435HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography10 nm6 nm
Die size215 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7435HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1700FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7435HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7435HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7435HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7435HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7435HS.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-12900E 17.13
+13.9%
Ryzen 7 7435HS 15.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-12900E 27214
+13.9%
Ryzen 7 7435HS 23888

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.13 15.04
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

i9-12900E has a 13.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7435HS, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-12900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7435HS in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-12900E is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7435HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7435HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-12900E
Core i9-12900E
AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
Ryzen 7 7435HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 24 votes

Rate Core i9-12900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 618 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7435HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-12900E or Ryzen 7 7435HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.