Ultra 9 285K vs i9-11900KB

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-11900KB
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.41
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.06
+199%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Core i9-11900KB by a whopping 199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking50353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.8674.28
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency20.8732.43
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-H (2021)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateMay 2021 (3 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$539$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 9 285K has 316% better value for money than i9-11900KB.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s250 MHz
L1 cache80K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin3 nm
Die size190 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA17871851
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel ProcessorsArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.45 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-11900KB 14.41
Ultra 9 285K 43.06
+199%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-11900KB 22891
Ultra 9 285K 68403
+199%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-11900KB 8924
Ultra 9 285K 25963
+191%

Blender(-)

i9-11900KB 263
+233%
Ultra 9 285K 79

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-11900KB 1656
Ultra 9 285K 2388
+44.2%

7-Zip Single

i9-11900KB 5979
Ultra 9 285K 7366
+23.2%

7-Zip

i9-11900KB 50152
Ultra 9 285K 129706
+159%

WebXPRT 3

i9-11900KB 269
Ultra 9 285K 387
+43.9%

CrossMark Overall

i9-11900KB 1785
Ultra 9 285K 2531
+41.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.41 43.06
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

i9-11900KB has 92.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 198.8% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-11900KB in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-11900KB and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-11900KB
Core i9-11900KB
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 63 votes

Rate Core i9-11900KB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 159 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-11900KB or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.