Celeron 560 vs i9-10980XE

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking261not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.51no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency11.84no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)no data
Release date19 October 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$979no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)no data
Threads36no data
Base clock speed3 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHzno data
Bus rate8 GT/s DMI3 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature86 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2066PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FSB parityno data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10980XE 32787
+9572%
Celeron 560 339

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-10980XE 1599
+572%
Celeron 560 238

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-10980XE 12172
+5124%
Celeron 560 233

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2019 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 31 Watt

i9-10980XE has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 560, on the other hand, has 432.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i9-10980XE is a desktop processor while Celeron 560 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10980XE and Celeron 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10980XE
Core i9-10980XE
Intel Celeron 560
Celeron 560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 566 votes

Rate Core i9-10980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 15 votes

Rate Celeron 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10980XE or Celeron 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.