Ryzen 9 9900X vs i9-10940X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10940X
2019
14 cores / 28 threads, 165 Watt
17.57
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
34.54
+96.6%

Ryzen 9 9900X outperforms Core i9-10940X by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 9 9900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking353109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.40
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency10.0827.24
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date19 October 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 9 9900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2824
Base clock speed3.3 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s DMI3 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 9 9900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066AM5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 9 9900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 9 9900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 9 9900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 9 9900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 9 9900X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10940X 17.57
Ryzen 9 9900X 34.54
+96.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10940X 27903
Ryzen 9 9900X 54858
+96.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.57 34.54
Recency 19 October 2019 15 August 2024
Physical cores 14 12
Threads 28 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 120 Watt

i9-10940X has 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads.

Ryzen 9 9900X, on the other hand, has a 96.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 37.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 9900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10940X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 9 9900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10940X
Core i9-10940X
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 101 vote

Rate Core i9-10940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 130 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 9900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10940X or Ryzen 9 9900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.