Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs i9-10910

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10910
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
14.04
+21.2%
Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.58

Core i9-10910 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v4 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking545691
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.193.02
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesComet LakeIntel Xeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency10.248.80
Architecture codenameComet Lake-S (2020)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date20 May 2020 (4 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$1,745

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-10910 has 370% better value for money than Xeon E5-2680 v4.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads2028
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache640 KB448 KB
L2 cache2.5 MB3.5 MB
L3 cache20 MB35 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C86 °C
Number of transistorsno data4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10910 14.04
+21.2%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10910 21487
+21.2%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 17724

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-10910 1749
+71.8%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 1018

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-10910 8417
+21.9%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 6905

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-10910 8131
+119%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 3707

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-10910 57842
+87.1%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 30922

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-10910 26
+44.9%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 18

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-10910 2302
+38.9%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 1657

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-10910 215
+115%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 100

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-10910 2.44
+116%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 1.13

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-10910 8613
+36.2%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 6323

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.04 11.58
Recency 20 May 2020 20 June 2016
Physical cores 10 14
Threads 20 28
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 120 Watt

i9-10910 has a 21.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

Xeon E5-2680 v4, on the other hand, has 40% more physical cores and 40% more threads, and 4.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-10910 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2680 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10910 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10910 and Xeon E5-2680 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10910
Core i9-10910
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 63 votes

Rate Core i9-10910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 3911 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10910 or Xeon E5-2680 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.