i7-10750H vs i9-10910

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10910
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
13.78
+81.3%
Core i7-10750H
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.60

Core i9-10910 outperforms Core i7-10750H by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking548967
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesComet LakeIntel Comet Lake
Power efficiency10.2415.69
Architecture codenameComet Lake-S (2020)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date20 May 2020 (4 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$435

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache640 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+

Security technologies

Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.15 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@30Hz4096 x 2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10910 13.78
+81.3%
i7-10750H 7.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10910 21487
+81.5%
i7-10750H 11839

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-10910 1749
+20.2%
i7-10750H 1455

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-10910 8444
+57.4%
i7-10750H 5365

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-10910 8131
+10.2%
i7-10750H 7377

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-10910 57842
+55.7%
i7-10750H 37154

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-10910 26
+83.7%
i7-10750H 14

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-10910 2302
+76.6%
i7-10750H 1304

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-10910 215
+9.1%
i7-10750H 197

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-10910 2.44
+10.9%
i7-10750H 2.2

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-10910 8613
+37%
i7-10750H 6287

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-10910 10244
+62.4%
i7-10750H 6308

Blender(-)

i9-10910 208
i7-10750H 371
+78.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-10910 1381
+8.7%
i7-10750H 1270

7-Zip Single

i9-10910 5690
+11.1%
i7-10750H 5120

7-Zip

i9-10910 60747
+71.9%
i7-10750H 35346

WebXPRT 3

i9-10910 236
+4.9%
i7-10750H 225

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.78 7.60
Recency 20 May 2020 2 April 2020
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

i9-10910 has a 81.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

i7-10750H, on the other hand, has 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-10910 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-10750H in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10910 is a desktop processor while Core i7-10750H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10910 and Core i7-10750H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10910
Core i9-10910
Intel Core i7-10750H
Core i7-10750H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 63 votes

Rate Core i9-10910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2148 votes

Rate Core i7-10750H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10910 or Core i7-10750H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.