Apple M3 Pro 11-Core vs i9-10900K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900K
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
14.88
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
2023
11 cores / 11 threads, 27 Watt
16.17
+8.7%

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core outperforms Core i9-10900K by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking495435
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.89no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M3
Power efficiency10.8554.61
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)no data
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)11 (Undeca-Core)
Threads2011
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.06 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache20 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size206 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data37000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10900K 14.88
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 16.17
+8.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10900K 22772
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 24753
+8.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-10900K 2533
+32.4%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 1913

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-10900K 217
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 281
+29.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-10900K 11393
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 13312
+16.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-10900K 1428
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 2331
+63.2%

WebXPRT 3

i9-10900K 255
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 431
+69%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.88 16.17
Recency 30 April 2020 30 October 2023
Physical cores 10 11
Threads 20 11
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 27 Watt

i9-10900K has 81.8% more threads.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, on the other hand, has a 8.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 10% more physical cores, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 363% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core.

Note that Core i9-10900K is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900K and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900K
Core i9-10900K
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1221 vote

Rate Core i9-10900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 90 votes

Rate Apple M3 Pro 11-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900K or Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.