EPYC Embedded 8434P vs i9-10900F

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking608not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency18.27no data
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads2096
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data4x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C75 °C
Number of transistorsno data35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200SP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1696

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 April 2020 1 October 2024
Physical cores 10 48
Threads 20 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

i9-10900F has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 380% more physical cores and 380% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i9-10900F is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900F and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900F
Core i9-10900F
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 334 votes

Rate Core i9-10900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900F or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.