Core 2 Quad Q9505S vs Core i9-10900F
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 607 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 18.28 | no data |
Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | no data |
Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 20 | no data |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.83 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 1333 MHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 6 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 76 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1200 | LGA775 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 30 April 2020 | 1 July 2009 |
Physical cores | 10 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
i9-10900F has an age advantage of 10 years, 150% more physical cores, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900F and Core 2 Quad Q9505S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.