Processor N200 vs i9-10880H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.57
+491%

Core i9-10880H outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 491% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10880H and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8242102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency19.3924.62
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10880H and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.3 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache512 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10880H and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA1440Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10880H and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-10880H and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10880H and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10880H and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10880H and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10880H 9.57
+491%
Processor N200 1.62

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-10880H 1791
+718%
Processor N200 219

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-10880H 213
+88.5%
Processor N200 113

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.57 1.62
Integrated graphics card 3.09 3.29
Recency 2 April 2020 3 January 2023
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 6 Watt

i9-10880H has a 490.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has 6.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-10880H is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10880H and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 61 vote

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 141 vote

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10880H or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.