Ryzen Threadripper 3980X vs i9-10800F
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 14 November 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 32 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1200 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 102.403 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 14 November 2019 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 48 |
| Threads | 20 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
i9-10800F has an age advantage of 5 months, and 330.8% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 3980X, on the other hand, has 380% more physical cores and 380% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10800F and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
