EPYC 7413 vs i7-990X Extreme Edition
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 121 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 14.84 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | Intel Core i7EE | AMD EPYC |
Architecture codename | Westmere (2010−2011) | Milan (2021−2023) |
Release date | 13 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,825 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 48 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.65 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus type | QPI | no data |
Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 26 | 26.5 |
L1 cache | no data | 1536 KB |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 12 MB |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm+ |
Die size | 239 mm2 | 4x 81 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 16,600 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
Socket | no data | SP3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB | 4 TiB |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7413.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 13 February 2011 | 12 January 2021 |
Physical cores | 6 | 24 |
Threads | 12 | 48 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 180 Watt |
i7-990X Extreme Edition has 38.5% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7413. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-990X Extreme Edition is a desktop processor while EPYC 7413 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.