i7-980X EE vs i7-990X EE
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-990X EE outperforms Core i7-980X EE by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-990X EE and Core i7-980X EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1378 | 1455 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Core i7 (Desktop) | Core i7 (Desktop) |
Power efficiency | 3.04 | 2.79 |
Architecture codename | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-990X EE and Core i7-980X EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 12 |
Boost clock speed | 3.73 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 6400 MHz | 6400 MHz |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-990X EE and Core i7-980X EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | LGA-1366 | LGA-1366 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 130 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.25 | 3.91 |
i7-990X EE has a 8.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-990X EE and Core i7-980X EE.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-990X EE and Core i7-980X EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.